Bruce Prichard Contrasts Goldust With The Pure Dustin Rhodes

[ad_1]

Bruce Prichard argued that it could have made sense for WWE to tug the plug on the Goldust character had it flopped, which was clearly not the case. He reiterated that Dustin’s temporary run as a household man “didn’t work” and took away from the mystique of the Goldust character.

By Might 1998, Dustin’s identification disaster reached new ranges as he set aflame his Goldust outfit and not glided by the moniker of The Artist Previously Referred to as Goldust — a persona that mimicked celebrities and fellow wrestlers with characters akin to “Chynadust,” “Sabledust,” “Mud Lovedust,” “Dustydust,” “Hunterdust,” “Marilyn Mansondust” and “Vaderdust.” The metamorphosis of the character — or regression based mostly on who you ask — didn’t resonate with Prichard by any means.

“No one gave a s–t about Dustin Rhodes,” Prichard confused. “They solely gave a s–t about Goldust. We stripped him of that, and every little thing that the viewers had an emotional attachment to. It is laborious to speak about as a result of I f—ing liked Dustin Rhodes, I believed he was one of the vital proficient abilities I’ve ever had the pleasure to work with. However whenever you take a flamboyant character like Goldust and strip all of it away, and also you make somebody a boring husband, I am not watching TV, and I am not watching WWE to see a boring husband with a child who goes on TV and says, ‘My daddy was imply to me. We did not get alongside.'”

In conclusion, Prichard felt that the storyline may have labored if Dusty had been nonetheless employed by WWE and will have interjected himself in an on-screen program together with his son. “There have been extra individuals connected to Dusty Rhodes than Dustin Rhodes. That viewers, the WWE followers, did not watch that different s–t [WCW]. Even when they knew that Dustin was Dusty’s son, they did not care. And I simply thought that every little thing attention-grabbing, every little thing emotional, we took away from him.”

[ad_2]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *